Appeal No. 96-1753
Application 08/063,202
With regard to all of the rejections which we have
sustained, we have carefully considered the arguments presented
by the appellants. However, they have not convinced us that the
decisions of the examiner were in error. Our position with
regard to each of the arguments should be apparent from the
foregoing recitations.
SUMMARY
The rejection of claims 1, 3 through 10, 12 through 14 and
22 as being unpatentable over Moore in view of Ekdahl is
sustained.
The rejection of claims 15 through 21 as being unpatentable
over Moore in view of Ekdahl is not sustained.
The rejection of claim 11 as being unpatentable over Ekdahl
in view of Moore is sustained.
The rejection of claim 1 as being unpatentable over Moore in
view of Strumor is sustained.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007