Appeal No. 96-1753
Application 08/063,202
The appellants’ invention is directed to a dispensing device
for dispensing several viscous materials (claims 1, 3 through 14,
and 22), and to a method for so doing (claims 15 through 21).
The subject matter before us on appeal is best illustrated by
reference to claims 1 and 15, which can be found in an appendix
to the Brief.
THE REFERENCES
The references relied upon by the examiner to support the
final rejection are:
Ekdahl 2,103,111 Dec. 21, 1937
Strumor 2,944,705 Jul. 12, 1960
Moore 4,715,518 Dec. 29, 1987
THE REJECTIONS
Claims 1, 3 through 10, 12 through 14 and 15 through 22
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Moore in view of Ekdahl.
Claim 11 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Ekdahl in view of Moore.
Claim 1 also stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Moore in view of Strumor.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007