Appeal No. 96-1766 Application 08/218,822 According to claim 1, a living actor is enveloped, except for small openings to enable the actor to see and breathe, in a body suit dyed in a specific blue color excluded from a special-effects, blue-screen type, matte cinemaphotography system used to photograph the body-suit covered actor, "thereby rendering the covered actor invisible to the camera." What is visible to the camera, instead, is "painting on the surfaces of the body suit in colors other than the specific color a drawing of said cartoon character whose appearance is that of the cartoon character and is unrelated to the appearance of the actor." With regard to the above-noted features of claim 1, the specification explains on page 9, lines 20, to page 10, line 2: It is important to bear in mind that in this technique, the actor is not dressed and made up to resemble a cartoon character for there is a highly perceptible difference between a drawing of a cartoon character and [an] individual made up to resemble a cartoon character. Thus in the movie "Popeye," the actor Robin Williams who clenches a corncob pipe in his teeth was made up to resemble the Popeye of the classic Popeye animated films. But Popeye, the actor, could never be confused with Popeye, the cartoon character, for a cartoon character drawing is an abstraction of an animal- like or humanoid figure. 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007