Appeal No. 96-1802 Page 3 Application No. 08/060,922 BACKGROUND The appellant's invention relates to a gas sampling tube for flue-gas analysis. An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 12, which appears in the appendix to the appellant's brief. The prior art reference of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is: Hölzl 5,039,322 Aug. 13, 1991 In addition, this panel of the Board will rely on admitted prior art as set forth on page 2, lines 8-17, of the appellant's specification. Claims 2-4, 8-10 and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Hölzl. Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and the appellant regarding the above-noted rejection, we make reference to the examiner's answer (PaperPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007