Appeal No. 96-1904
Application 08/164,854
8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, and 21 is unpatentable under 35
U.S.C. § 103.
While we fully appreciate appellant’s point of view
as to the patentability of the claims 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15,
17, 18, and 21 as expressed in the brief (pages 11 through
15), this
panel of the board is not persuaded thereby. We are aware of
appellant’s assessment of the respective teachings of the IBM
reference and Leipzig as not exhibiting a standard arrangement
of keys and numbers. Notwithstanding appellant’s perception
of these latter teachings, the evidence as a whole clearly
informs
us that the content of appellant’s claims would have been
suggested to one having ordinary skill in the art.
We reverse the rejection of claim 22 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103.
20
Page: Previous 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007