Ex parte BLISH - Page 28




          Appeal No. 96-1904                                                          
          Application 08/164,854                                                      




                    Should the appellant elect to prosecute further                   
          before the Primary Examiner pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b)(1),               
          in order to preserve the right to seek review under 35 U.S.C.               
          §§ 141 or 145 with respect to the affirmed rejection, the                   
          effective date of the affirmance is deferred until conclusion               
          of the prosecution before the examiner unless, as a mere                    
          incident to the limited prosecution, the affirmed rejection is              
          overcome.                                                                   


                    If the appellant elects prosecution before the                    
          exami-ner and this does not result in allowance of the                      
          application, abandonment or a second appeal, this case should               
          be returned to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences                
          for final action  on the affirmed rejection, including any                  
          timely request for rehearing thereof.                                       


                    No time period for taking any subsequent action in                
          con-nection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR §                 
          1.136(a).                                                                   

                                         28                                           





Page:  Previous  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007