Appeal No. 96-2040 Application No. 08/221,370 Claims 18 through 20 and 72 through 102 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as unpatentable over Mizutori. Reference is made to the brief and answer for the respective positions of appellants and the examiner. OPINION We reverse. In our view, while the instant independent claims appear rather broad in nature, the examiner has simply not made out a prima facie case of obviousness regarding the claimed subject matter. Each of the instant independent claims requires, at least, the determination of a workload value for a first facsimile machine, the determination of whether that workload value exceeds a predetermined value and, if the workload value does, indeed, exceed the predetermined value, then transferring stored data files from the first facsimile machine to another facsimile machine. Thus, there must be a determination that the workload value exceeds a predetermined value. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007