Ex parte REIFMAN et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 96-2040                                                          
          Application No. 08/221,370                                                  


               Claims 18 through 20 and 72 through 102 stand rejected                 
          under 35 U.S.C. 103 as unpatentable over Mizutori.                          




               Reference is made to the brief and answer for the                      
          respective positions of appellants and the examiner.                        
                                       OPINION                                        
               We reverse.                                                            
               In our view, while the instant independent claims appear               
          rather broad in nature, the examiner has simply not made out a              
          prima facie case of obviousness regarding the claimed subject               
          matter.                                                                     
               Each of the instant independent claims requires, at                    
          least, the determination of a workload value for a first                    
          facsimile machine, the determination of whether that workload               
          value exceeds a predetermined value and, if the workload value              
          does, indeed, exceed the predetermined value, then                          
          transferring stored data files from the first facsimile                     
          machine to another facsimile machine.  Thus, there must be a                
          determination that the workload value exceeds a predetermined               
          value.                                                                      
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007