Ex parte REIFMAN et al. - Page 7




          Appeal No. 96-2040                                                          
          Application No. 08/221,370                                                  


               We base our decision on the examiner’s rejection and                   
          rationale therefor, as well as on appellants’ arguments                     
          thereagainst.  While we make no warranty, one way or the                    
          other, that no proper rejection of the instant claims and/or                
          any individual claim might be made by applying the Mizutori                 
          reference in some way different from that of the examiner, it               
          is clear to us, for the reasons supra, that the examiner has                
          simply failed to establish a case of prima facie obviousness.               









               Accordingly, the examiner’s decision rejecting claims 18               
          through 20 and 72 through 102 under 35 U.S.C. 103 is reversed.              
                                      REVERSED                                        





                         ERROL A. KRASS                     )                         
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                       )                              

                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007