Ex parte ITO et al. - Page 8




          Appeal No. 96-2248                                                          
          Application 08/341,455                                                      


          and Webb do not establish a prima facie case of obviousness                 
          with respect to claim 1, the rejections of claims 1 through                 
          12, and 14 through 16 based on Nakase in view of Rennen and                 
          Webb as the basic combination of references, cannot be                      
          sustained.                                                                  


                                       SUMMARY                                        
               A rejection of claims 1 through 4 under 35 U.S.C. § 103                
          has been affirmed.                                                          
               The rejections of claims 5 through 12 and 14 through 16                
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103 have been reversed.                                   
               The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.                      
















                                          8                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007