Ex parte CRAWFORD - Page 2




                Appeal No. 96-2267                                                                                                            
                Application 08/154,344                                                                                                        


                from further consideration under 37 CFR § 1.142(b) as not                                                                     
                readable on the elected species.2                                                                                             
                         Appellant’s invention pertains to a menstrual cup, that is,                                                          
                a small self-supporting receptacle for positioning in the vaginal                                                             
                channel for collecting menstrual discharge.  A prior art                                                                      
                menstrual cup is illustrated in Figure 1 and includes, inter                                                                  
                alia, a tube-like withdrawal extension 6 that can be used to                                                                  
                remove the cup from the vagina (specification, page 4).  As                                                                   
                explained by appellant on page 2 of the specification,                                                                        
                         removal of the menstrual cup from the vagina should be                                                               
                         accomplished on a regular basis for emptying, cleaning                                                               
                         and hygienic purposes.  It has been determined,                                                                      
                         however, that between such removal operations, it would                                                              
                         be a matter of great convenience if the menstrual cup                                                                
                         could be drained while in place.  The present invention                                                              
                         is based on the discovery that the withdrawal                                                                        
                         extension, if properly modified, may be used for this                                                                
                         purpose.  The withdrawal extension is provided in                                                                    
                         tubular form, having a longitudinal passage which                                                                    
                         communicates with the interior of the menstrual cup                                                                  
                         body.  Means are provided to close the passage in the                                                                
                         withdrawal extension and the withdrawal extension                                                                    
                         passage is normally kept closed.  The closure means are                                                              
                         of such nature, however, that with appropriate                                                                       
                         manipulation by the user, the passage may be opened for                                                              
                         drainage purposes and thereafter reclosed.                                                                           





                         2In the final rejection (Paper No. 7), the examiner                                                                  
                inadvertently failed to mention the status of claims 13 and 14.                                                               
                                                                    -2-                                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007