Ex parte NAGY - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-2307                                                          
          Application No. 08/293,630                                                  


          blended span gas for obtaining simultaneous readings of the                 
          multiple analyzers for calibration or diagnostic purposes.                  
               Claim 6 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it               
          reads as follows:                                                           
               6.  In a method for calibrating or diagnosing multiple                 
          engine exhaust gas analyzers responsive to HC, NOx, CO and CO2              
          constituent gases, the steps of:                                            
               providing a blended span gas comprising a known mixture of a           
          zero gas with said constituent gases; and                                   
               simultaneously supplying to all of said analyzers at least             
          one sample comprising a selected division of said blended span              
          gas for obtaining simultaneous readings of the multiple analyzers           
          for calibration or diagnostic purposes.                                     
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Rankine et al. (Rankine)           3,854,876      Dec. 17, 1974             
          Barcellona et al. (Barcellona)     4,498,496      Feb. 12, 1985             
          Kimura et al. (Kimura)             5,333,487      Aug.  2, 1994             
               Claims 1 through 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as            
          being unpatentable over Kimura in view of Rankine and Barcellona.           
               Reference is made to the briefs and the answers for the                
          respective positions of the appellant and the examiner.                     
                                       OPINION                                        
               We have carefully considered the entire record before us,              
          and we will reverse the obviousness rejection of claims 1                   
          through 10.                                                                 



                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007