Appeal No. 96-2307 Application No. 08/293,630 invention based upon the disparate teachings of the applied prior art. Thus, the obviousness rejection of claims 1 through 10 is reversed. DECISION The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. REVERSED JAMES D. THOMAS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ERROL A. KRASS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007