THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte TADAYOSHI NAGAOKA
__________
Appeal No. 96-2354
Application No. 08/147,0861
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB and McQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner
finally rejecting claims 15-20. Claims 1 through 11, 13, 14
and 21 have been canceled, and claim 12 has been withdrawn
1Application for patent filed November 3, 1993. According
to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/769,061, filed September 30, 1991, now
abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007