THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ROBERT S. PHARR
_____________
Appeal No. 96-3304
Application 08/279,5651
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, STAAB
and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1-23 which are all the claims pending in
the application.
Appellant’s invention is a machine readable display unit
for metered devices. Claim 1 is exemplary of the subject
1Application for patent filed July 25, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007