Ex parte PHARR - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-3304                                                          
          Application 08/279,565                                                      

          matter on appeal and recites:                                               
               1.  A machine readable display unit for metered devices                
          of the type displaying a changeable, readable indicia                       
          proportional to an input thereto, said input varying in                     
          relative value over a period of time, said machine readable                 
          display unit comprising:                                                    
               means for displaying alpha-numeric indicia in a machine                
          readable format;                                                            
               means for changing said readable indicia responsive to                 
          the input to the metered device.                                            
                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
               The following references were relied on by the examiner                
          in support of the rejections:                                               
          Becker et al. (Becker)        4,588,949                May  13,             
          1986                                                                        
          Munday et al. (Munday)        4,977,368                Dec. 11,             
          1990                                                                        
          Wakatsuki et al. (Wakatsuki)       5,278,551                Jan.            
          11, 1994                                                                    
                                                  (filed April 16, 1993)              
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               Claims 1-9 and 11-22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103              
          as being unpatentable over Becker in view of Wakatsuki.                     
               Claims 10 and 23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as               
          being unpatentable over Becker in view of Wakatsuki as applied              
          to claims 1-9 and 11-22 above, and further in view of Munday.               
               Rather than reiterate the examiner’s full statement of                 

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007