Paper No. 24
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte THOMAS D. HAUK
______________
Appeal No. 96-3463
Application 08/514,8351
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before MEISTER, FRANKFORT and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Thomas D. Hauk (the appellant) appeals from the final
rejection of claims 12, 14-18 and 20-25, the only claims
remaining in the application.
We REVERSE.
1Application for patent filed August 14, 1995. According to
appellant, this application is a continuation of Application 08/337,948,
filed November 9, 1994, which is a division of Application 08/067,216,
filed May 26, 1993, now U.S. Patent No. 5,386,746, issued February 7, 1995.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007