Appeal No. 96-3463
Application 08/514,835
die from the disparate teachings of either Wheeler and Inoue and
incorporate into the device of Hauk (who already teaches an
arrangement to prevent slippage by allowing both gripping dies to
move rotatably) in order to "allow for better gripping and
ungripping" as the examiner proposes to do. This being the case,
we will not sustain the rejection of claims 15, 17, 21 and 24
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Hauk in view of
Wheeler or Inoue.
The examiner's rejections of the appealed claims 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 are reversed.
REVERSED
JAMES M. MEISTER )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD )
Administrative Patent Judge )
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007