THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 37 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte CHRISTOPHER H. STROLLE _____________ Appeal No. 96-4011 Application 07/996,5251 ______________ HEARD: JANUARY 14, 1998 _______________ Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judges. HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL 1Application for patent filed December 23, 1992. According to applicant, the application is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/609,536 filed November 5, 1990, now abandoned. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007