Appeal No. 96-4011
Application No. 07/996,525
generating a phase alternating carrier having a phase that at
corresponding horizontal spatial locations is not different from
line to line within each field, but does alternate from field to
field.” As indicated supra, Table 1 of appellant’s disclosure
shows such fields and lines. The 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of
claims 1, 2 and 37 is, therefore, reversed.
The 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of claims 15 through 17 and 19
is reversed because neither Ishikawa nor Moles teaches or would
have suggested the frequency bands required by claim 14.
The 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of claims 11 through 13, 21,
31, 35 and 36 is reversed because neither Ishikawa, Moles nor Ko
teaches or would have suggested: first, second and third
contiguous frequency bands that overlap at the edges as required
by claims 8 and 14; and the first, second and third frequency
bands, and means for generating a transposed luminance signal in
accordance with a first carrier having a phase that alternates
from field-to-field but not from line-to-line as required by
claim 32.
The 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of claims 18 and 20 is
reversed because neither Ishikawa nor Tanaka teaches or would
have suggested the first, second and third contiguous frequency
bands that overlap at the edges as required by claim 14.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007