Appeal No. 96-4011
Application No. 07/996,525
Claims 3, 4, 6, 8 through 10, 14, 22 through 26, 28, 32
through 34 and 38 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as
being anticipated by Ishikawa.
Claims 1, 2 and 37 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Ishikawa in view of Suga.
Claims 15 through 17 and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Ishikawa in view of Moles.
Claims 11 through 13, 21, 31, 35 and 36 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Ishikawa in view of
Moles and Ko.
Claims 18 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Ishikawa in view of Moles and Tanaka.
Reference is made to the briefs and the answer for the
respective positions of the appellant and the examiner.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the entire record before us,
and we will reverse all of the rejections.
Ishikawa discloses apparatus in an extended definition
television system (EDTV) for recording a wide frequency band
video signal using a frequency interleaving technique (column 1,
lines 10 through 27). Figure 1 in Ishikawa discloses a system
for transmitting an encoded EDTV signal from terminal 19 that
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007