THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JOHN T. RISSE
__________
Appeal No. 97-0040
Application 08/303,0651
__________
HEARD: February 2, 1998
__________
Before CALVERT, MEISTER and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 to
20, 22 to 27 and 29. Claim 21 has been cancelled, and claim 28
is indicated as allowable, if written in independent form . 2
1Application for patent filed September 8, 1994.
2On page 3 of the final rejection (Paper No. 8), the
examiner stated that claim 28 also should be rewritten to
overcome the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112, but claim 28 was
not rejected on that, or any other, ground.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007