Ex parte MOLL et al. - Page 3




                Appeal No. 97-0507                                                                                                            
                Application 08/202,609                                                                                                        


                repetitively inputting representative aeromagnetically measured                                                               
                data above the surface of the earth over known depth to basement                                                              
                rock regions and for repetitively comparing the output of said                                                                
                output layer elements with said known depth to basement rock to                                                               
                form error signals, and for changing as a function of said error                                                              
                signals the weighting functions of said first and second systems                                                              
                of interconnections between said input layer and said hidden                                                                  
                layer and said output layer of elements so as to minimize the                                                                 
                magnitude of said error signals, until such magnitude is smaller                                                              
                than a predetermined accuracy value.                                                                                          
                         The following references are relied on by the examiner:                                                              
                McCormack                                 5,265,192                                 Nov. 23, 1993                             
                                                                                   (filed Sep. 20, 1990)                                      
                Reilly et al. (Reilly), “An Overview of Neural Networks: Early                                                                
                Models to Real World Systems,” An Intro. To Neural and Electronic                                                             
                Networks, Academic Press, pp. 227-248 (1990).                                                                                 
                         Claims 25 to 30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) as                                                           
                being clearly anticipated by Reilly.  These same claims also                                                                  
                stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being clearly                                                                      
                anticipated by McCormack.                 2                                                                                   
                         Rather than repeat the positions of the appellants and the                                                           
                examiner, reference is made to the briefs and the answer for the                                                              
                respective details thereof.                                                                                                   
                                                                 OPINION                                                                      
                         At the outset, we note that appellants indicate at the top                                                           
                of page 3 of the brief that a companion divisional application                                                                

                         2A rejection of certain claims under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                                                           
                set forth in the final rejection has not been maintained or                                                                   
                repeated in the answer.  Therefore, it is not before us.                                                                      
                                                                      3                                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007