THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte THOMAS L. LINSENBARDT, RICHARD D. BUCKLEY,
HAROLD YOUNGER, DARRELL D. HARRIS and
DENNIS J. STRUEMPH
________________
Appeal No. 97-0612
Application 08/322,2181
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, FRANKFORT and
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1 through
3, all of the claims pending in the application.
1Application for patent filed October 13, 1994. According
to appellants, the application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 07/791,103, filed November 12, 1991, now U.S. Patent
No. 5,359,874, issued November 1, 1994.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007