THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PAUL A. DICKIE, KURTIS D. KLEIS and MICHAEL A. MIKE
____________
Appeal No. 97-0990
Application No. 08/105,0931
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before MEISTER, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 7, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.2
1Application for patent filed August 10, 1993.
2Claim 5 has been amended subsequent to the final
rejection.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007