THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte TSUNEKAZU UDAGAWA
________________
Appeal No. 97-1250
Application 08/347,0871
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before CALVERT, COHEN and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal originally was taken from the final rejection of
claims 1 and 3 through 11. The appellant has since canceled
claim 4, amended claims 3, 5, 7 and 11, and added claim 12. The
record indicates that claims 1, 3, 5, 6 and 8 through 12
currently stand rejected and that claim 7, which had been
1Application for patent filed November 23, 1994.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007