Ex parte UDAGAWA - Page 2




                    Appeal No. 97-1250                                                                                                                                     
                    Application 08/347,087                                                                                                                                 


                    indicated as containing allowable subject matter, currently                                                                                            
                    stands objected to as depending from a rejected base claim.                                                                                            
                    Thus, the appeal as to claim 7 is hereby dismissed, leaving for                                                                                        
                    review the standing rejections of claims 1, 3, 5, 6 and 8 through                                                                                      
                    12, the only other claims presently pending in the application.                                                                                        
                              The subject matter on appeal relates to a metal laminate                                                                                     
                    cylinder head gasket.  Copies of claims 1, 3, 5, 6 and 8 through                                                                                       
                    12 appear in the appendix to the appellant’s brief (Paper No.                                                                                          
                    13).                                                                                                                                                   
                              The reference relied upon by the examiner as evidence of                                                                                     
                    anticipation and obviousness is:                                                                                                                       
                    Udagawa                                           0,440,831                               Aug. 14, 1991                                                
                    (European Patent Document)                                                                                                                             
                              Claims 1, 3, 5, 6, 9, 10 and 12 stand rejected under 35                                                                                      
                    U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Udagawa, and claims 8 and                                                                                      
                    11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                                                                                          
                    over Udagawa.             2                                                                                                                            
                              Reference is made to the appellant’s brief and to the                                                                                        
                    examiner’s answer for the respective positions of the appellant                                                                                        


                              2The 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, and 35 U.S.C. §                                                                                      
                    102(b) rejections of claim 11 which were set forth in the final                                                                                        
                    rejection are presumed to have been withdrawn since they have not                                                                                      
                    been restated in the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 14).  See Ex                                                                                         
                    parte Emm, 118 USPQ 180, 181 (Bd App 1957).                                                                                                            
                                                                                   -2-                                                                                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007