THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte NORMAN H. KEMP
_____________
Appeal No. 97-1442
Application 08/353,6311
______________
HEARD: MAY 4, 1998
_______________
Before MEISTER, MCQUADE and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-3 which are
the only claims pending in the application.
1Application for patent filed December 12, 1994. According to appellant, this application
is a division of Application 08/254,525, filed June 6, 1994, now U.S. Patent No. 5,400,711,
granted March 28, 1995, which is a division of Application 08/172,253, filed December 23, 1993,
now U.S. Patent No. 5,345,865, granted September 13, 1994, which is a continuation of
Application 08/044,215, filed April 7, 1993, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007