Appeal No. 97-1442 Application 08/353,631 rotating the two ink rollers at different speeds. Shepherd does not cure the deficiencies of Domotor in that Shepherd discloses driving an exit and advance roller for a workpiece, rather than two ink rollers, at different speeds. In view of the foregoing, we will not sustain the examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of claims 1 and 2. The decision of the examiner is reversed REVERSED JAMES M. MEISTER ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JOHN P. McQUADE ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007