THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RANKO SCEPANOVIC,
JAMES S. KOFORD,
EDWIN E. JONES,
DOUGLAS B. BOYLE, and
MICHAEL D. ROSTOKER
__________
Appeal No. 97-2053
Application 08/229,6241
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH, and FLEMING, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner's rejection of claims 1-27, which constitute
all the claims in the application. In the answer the examiner
withdrew the pending rejection of claims 1-27 and added a
1Application for patent filed April 19, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007