THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JACKIE R. BOYLES, JAMES R. STOY
and JAMES L. G. SCHRODT
____________
Appeal No. 97-2418
Application No. 08/390,8431
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McQUADE, NASE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 3, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.
1Application for patent filed May 1, 1995. According to
the appellants, the application is a continuation-in-part of
Application No. 08/209,349, filed March 14, 1994, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007