THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 24 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte PAUL J. BUSCEMI ____________ Appeal No. 97-2552 Application No. 08/541,6581 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before CALVERT, ABRAMS, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 3 through 8. Claims 1, 2 and 9 through 18 have been allowed. We REVERSE and enter a new rejection pursuant to 37 CFR 1Application for patent filed October 2, 1995. According to the appellant, the application is a continuation of Application No. 08/134,978, filed October 12, 1993, now abandoned.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007