THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte TAKASHI IIZUKA
_____________
Appeal No. 97-3467
Application 08/279,7481
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and LEE Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-4 and 6-12. Claim
5 has been canceled. No claim has been allowed.
References relied on by the Examiner
Takemoto et al. (Takemoto) 4,975,717 Dec. 04,
1990
Morimoto 5,194,981 Mar. 16,
1993
1Application for patent filed July 22, 1994. The appellant has claimed foreign
priority to Japanese application 5-199484, filed August 11, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007