Appeal No. 97-3467
Application 08/279,748
skill and knowledge possessed by one with ordinary skill in the
art would have included the recognition that the specific region
focused on by the appellant in Figure 26 has a particular
significance insofar as reduction of distortion is concerned.
For the foregoing reasons, we do not sustain the rejection of
claims 1-4 and 6-12 over Morimoto and Takemoto.
Conclusion
The rejection of claims 1-4 and 6-12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Morimoto and Takemoto is reversed.
REVERSED
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
JAMESON LEE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
vsh
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007