THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte CHAZELLE HUBERT1
_____________
Appeal No. 97-3754
Application 08/302,5042
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CALVERT, COHEN and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
We note that there is some discrepancy in the file as to1
appellant’s name. In the original declaration and in the
heading of papers, his name is given as “Chazelle Hubert,” but
in the supplemental declaration (Paper No. 9, filed January
17, 1996) and in the “Real Party in Interest” section of the
brief it is given as “Hubert Chazelle.”
Application for patent filed September 8, 1994.2
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007