Appeal No. 97-3754 Application 08/302,504 DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 to 13, all the claims in the application. In the examiner’s answer, the examiner made a new ground of rejection, in response to which appellant filed, on November 13, 1997, a Supplemental Reply Brief on Appeal (Paper No. 23), and an Amendment Under 37 CFR § 1.193(b)(Paper No. 24), amending independent claims 1 and 10. Claim 10 is illus- trative of the subject matter in issue; as amended, it reads: 10. An apparatus for compacting and cutting volumi- nous objects of strong elasticity, the apparatus comprising: (a) means for cutting; (b) a rectangular tunnel having a substantially horizontally aligned top wall, a substantially horizontally aligned bottom wall, the bottom wall parallel to the top wall, and two substantially vertically aligned side walls, each of the two side walls extending between the top wall and the bottom wall, the tunnel further including an entrance and an extremity, the tunnel being wider at the entrance than at the extremity, the extremity of the tunnel in communication with the means for cutting; 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007