Appeal No. 97-3754
Application 08/302,504
and 10, and will not sustain the rejection of those claims, or
of claims 4 to 6, 8 and 9 dependent thereon. Also, since the
Baikoff and Kisielewski references do not supply the
deficiencies noted with regard to Barclay, we will not sustain
the rejections of claims 2, 3, 7 and 11 to 13.
Conclusion
The examiner’s decision to reject claims 1 to 13 is
reversed.
REVERSED
IAN A. CALVERT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF
PATENT
IRWIN CHARLES COHEN ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge )
INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
LAWRENCE J. STAAB )
Administrative Patent Judge )
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007