Ex parte GAMMINO - Page 2




               Appeal No. 97-4150                                                                                               
               Application No. 08/186,820                                                                                       


                                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                                            


                      This appeal involves claims 1 through 5, 7, 9 through 11,                                                 
               13, 15, 16, 18, 20 and 24 through 58.2                                                                           
                      The disclosed invention relates to a telecommunications                                                   
               method and apparatus for evaluating a third plurality of dialing                                                 
               signals in a dialing sequence to determine whether the dialing                                                   
               signals are located in the dialing sequence to accomplish                                                        
               international dialing.  If the third plurality of dialing signals                                                
               are located in a position for international dialing, then the                                                    
               telecommunications apparatus prevents the establishment of an                                                    
               international telephone call.                                                                                    
                      Claims 1 and 4 are illustrative of the claimed invention,                                                 
               and they read as follows:                                                                                        
                      1. Telecommunications apparatus for selectively preventing                                                
               establishment of a telephone call to a telephone number having a                                                 
               central office exchange code, said telecommunications apparatus                                                  
               being capable of transmitting a dialing sequence which includes a                                                
               first plurality of dialing signals, followed by a second                                                         

                      2Although claims 8, 14, 19 and 21 through 23 were                                                         
               officially canceled (paper number 44), claims 6, 12 and 17 were                                                  
               not officially canceled by amendment (paper number 40) because                                                   
               the record indicates that the examiner (paper number 42) denied                                                  
               entry of this amendment.  Inasmuch as appellant and the examiner                                                 
               both agree (Brief, page 3, and Answer, page 1) that claims 6, 12                                                 
               and 17 are not on appeal, we will limit our review to the                                                        
               appealed claims 1 through 5, 7, 9 through 11, 13, 15, 16, 18, 20                                                 
               and 24 through 58.                                                                                               
                                                               2                                                                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007