THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte SHINZO SAKUMA, and
SAMPEI MIYAMOTO
_____________
Appeal No. 97-4425
Application 08/619,4181
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KRASS, FLEMING and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 11-16, 18 and 19. Claims
1-10 have been canceled. Claim 20 has been allowed.
Reference Relied on by the Examiner
1Application filed March 21, 1996. According to the
appellants, it is a continuation of Application 08/420,335, filed
April 11, 1995, now abandoned, which is a continuation of
Application 08/243,585, filed May 16, 1994, now abandoned, which
is a division of Application 07/986,998, filed December 7, 1992,
now Patent No. 5,313,426.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007