Ex parte MORGHEN - Page 1




                                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                        
                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)                                                                         
                 was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                                                                            
                 not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                                    
                                                                                                  Paper No. 12                                          

                                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                        
                                                                   __________                                                                           
                                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                         
                                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                                           
                                                                   __________                                                                           
                                                    Ex parte MANFRED A. MORGHEN                                                                         
                                                                   __________                                                                           
                                                           Appeal No. 98-0005                                                                           
                                                    Application No. 08/613,8081                                                                         
                                                                   __________                                                                           
                                                                    ON BRIEF                                                                            
                                                                   __________                                                                           

                 Before MEISTER, ABRAMS and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                         
                 ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                   

                                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                           
                          This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner                                                                           
                 finally rejecting claims 1-6, 10 and 11.  Claims 7 and 8 have                                                                          
                 been canceled, claim 9 has been indicated as being allowable                                                                           
                 if rewritten in independent form, and claims 12-20 have been                                                                           



                          1Application for patent filed March 6, 1996.                                                                                  
                                                                           1                                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007