THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MANFRED A. MORGHEN
__________
Appeal No. 98-0005
Application No. 08/613,8081
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before MEISTER, ABRAMS and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner
finally rejecting claims 1-6, 10 and 11. Claims 7 and 8 have
been canceled, claim 9 has been indicated as being allowable
if rewritten in independent form, and claims 12-20 have been
1Application for patent filed March 6, 1996.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007