Appeal No. 98-0005
Application No. 08/613,808
It therefore is our opinion that the teachings of the
prior art relied upon fail to establish a prima facie case of
obviousness with respect to the subject matter recited in
independent claim 1. This being the case, we will not sustain
the rejection of claim 1 or, it follows, of any of the
dependent claims.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
JAMES M. MEISTER )
Administrative Patent Judge)
)
)
)
NEAL E. ABRAMS ) BOARD OF
PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
JEFFREY V. NASE )
Administrative Patent Judge)
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007