Ex parte JOHNSON et al. - Page 12




          Appeal No. 98-0409                                                          
          Application 08/420,480                                                      


          countersink (a) for retaining cartridges in the holder.                     
          Nevertheless, in view of the combined teachings of Goss,                    
          Benward and Peckels the artisan would have found it obvious as              
          a matter of "common sense" (see In re Bozek, supra) to                      
          additionally provide the holder of Goss with an inwardly                    
          extending tab "for better retention" of the cartridge as the                
          examiner has proposed.  This is especially the case, in our                 
          view, since Goss expressly recognizes the need to firmly and                
          securely hold the cartridge in the holder and Benward teaches               
          a pair of retaining members (i.e.,                                          






          the inwardly extending tabs 45) should be provided in order to              
          ensure that there is "no danger" of the article being held                  
          from "falling out of the holder."  Accordingly, we will                     
          sustain the rejection of claims 4 and 15-19 under 35 U.S.C. §               
          103 based on the combined teachings of Goss, Benward and                    
          Peckels.                                                                    
               In summary:                                                            


                                         12                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007