WANG V. TUCHOLSKI - Page 52





          Interference No. 103,036                                                    



                    In addition, the party Burroughs et al. relies upon the           
          following testimony by witnesses associated with the opposing               
          parties.                                                                    
                    Dr. Alan Salkind, one of Cataldi’s witnesses called by            
          the party Wang et al., testified that he presumed that the                  
          nonconductive layer is both thermally nonconductive as well as              
          electrically nonconductive.  BR 2903.  Dr. Feder, an expert                 
          testifying on behalf of the party Cataldi et al., testified with            
          respect to Burroughs et al. Exhibit 5 (BX 5), which is directly             
          analogous to the thermal battery strength indicator described in            
          the Burroughs et al. patent, that nonconductive would normally              
          mean either electrically or thermally nonconductive.  BR 3938 to            
          3939.                                                                       
                    Mr. Patrick D. Hein, a witness for the party Caltaldi             
          et al., testified on the operativeness of the Burroughs                     
          et al. specification.  Mr. Hein testified that he tested                    
          materials and found that group III materials (ten thin synthetic            
          polymeric films having thicknesses ranging from 0.001 to 0.005              




                                           -52-                                       




Page:  Previous  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007