Interference No. 103,146
corroborating testimony of inventor as to date of conception).
See also, for conception,
Rivise and Caesar, Interference Law and Practice, Vol. I, §
126 and Vol. III, § 542 (Michie Co. 1947) and for reduction to
practice, Vol. III §§ 543 and 544.
Barker’s Priority Case
For proof of conception, Barker relies on Barker’s
testimony and the sketch attached as page 68 of BX-118 dated
December 8, 1981. See Barker brief at 15, 52. Apparently,
Barker is relying on the construction and photographing of a
prototype on May 5, 1982 and electrical leakage tests of the
same or similar prototypes “in and around May 1982" as an 5
actual reduction to practice. Barker Brief at 19, 55. Again,
Barker is relying on his own testimony (BR43-46) and Barker
exhibit
BX-126-128 for the photographs and memorandums BX-123, 124
ordering tests along with BX-125, test results.
5BR45.
15
Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007