THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 57
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RICHARD S. HANSON, MICHAEL C. FLICKINGER,
FREDERICK J. SCHENDEL and MICHAEL V. GUETTLER
__________
Appeal No. 94-3255
Application 07/673,2641
__________
HEARD: DECEMBER 10, 1998
__________
Before CAROFF, GRON and ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judges.
ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claim 55. Claims 1 through 24, 37 through 39 and
49 have been withdrawn from consideration pursuant to 37 CFR
§ 1.142(b). Claims 25, 26 through 36, 40 through 48, 50
1Application for patent filed March 20, 1991. According
to the appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/335,691, filed April 10, 1989, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007