Ex parte HANSON et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 94-3255                                                          
          Application 07/673,264                                                      


          through 54, 56 and 57 have been canceled.                                   
               Claim 55 reads as follows:                                             
               55.  An amino acid producing auxotrophic bacterium of                  
          a biologically pure strain ribulose monophosphate pathway                   
          utilizing bacterium Bacillus MGA3, or biologically pure strain              
          corresponding environmental isolate of Bacillus MGA3 having                 
          all of the identifying characteristics of Bacillus MGA3 or                  
          biologically pure strain stable morphological mutants of said               
          Bacillus MGA3 or its corresponding environmental isolate, said              
          auxotroph exhibiting sustained growth at 50EC in nutrient                   
          media comprising methanol as a source of carbon and energy and              
          vitamin B , and excreting at least about 5 g/l of lysine,                   
                   12                                                                 
          aspartic acid, phenylalanine, or tryptophan when growth on a                
          media containing a nitrogen source.                                         
               Claim 55 stands rejected under (i) the second paragraph                
          of 35 U.S.C. § 112 as failing to particularly point out and                 
          distinctly claim the subject matter which the appellants                    
          regard as the invention, and (ii) the first paragraph of §                  
          112, as the claim is not supported by an enabling disclosure                
          and an adequate written description.                                        
               The examiner does not rely on any references to support                
          the rejections.                                                             
               We have carefully considered the entire record which                   
          includes, inter alia, the specification, the appellants’                    
          Brief, Reply Brief and Supplemental Reply Brief, as well as                 
          the examiner’s Answer and Supplemental Answer.  We affirm the               

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007