Appeal No. 95-0386
Application No. 07/854,122
an appropriate prior art rejection and provide appellants with
an opportunity to respond.
For the reasons set forth in the body of this opinion, we
reverse the examiner's prior art and non-prior art rejections.
We remand this application to the examiner with instructions
to reevaluate the patentability of claims 1 through 24 in
light of Warfield.
This application, by virtue of its “special” status,
requires immediate action. See the Manual of Patent Examining
Procedure, § 708.01(d). It is important that the Board of
Patent Appeals and Interferences be informed promptly of any
action affecting the appeal in this case.
REVERSED AND REMANDED
SHERMAN D. WINTERS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
)
TEDDY S. GRON ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
TERRY J. OWENS )
-8-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007