THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LOUIS A. LICHT
____________
Appeal No. 95-0972
Application No. 07/650,4531
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge,
WILLIAM F. SMITH and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 19 and 22 through 29, which are
all of the claims pending in this application.
1Application for patent filed February 4, 1991.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007