THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte FRANK JAO, PATRICK S. L. WONG,
HOA T. HUYNH, KATHY McCHESNEY
and PAMELA K. WAT
________________
Appeal No. 95-2244
Application 08/036,6481
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before METZ, GARRIS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
METZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed March 24, 1993. Said
Application a continuation of U.S. Application Serial
Numbers 07/971,011, filed on November 2, 1992, now U.S.
Patent Number 5,252,338, issued on October 12, 1993;
said application a continuation of U.S. Serial Number
07/799,451, filed on November 26, 1991, now
U.S. Patent Number 5,190,765, issued on March 2,
1993; which is a continuation-in-part of
U.S. Application Serial Number 07/722,622, filed
on June 27, 1991, now U.S. Patent Number
5,160,744, issued November 3, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007