Appeal No. 95-2244 Application 08/036,648 SUMMARY Accordingly, for all the reasons stated above, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 16 through 29 as unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, is REVERSED. REVERSED ANDREW H. METZ ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT BRADLEY R. GARRIS ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) THOMAS A. WALTZ ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 10Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007