Paper No. 34 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte ARTHUR L. HORWICH, MINGYUAN CHENG, RICHARD MALLBERG, DONALD S. READING and ALAN MYERS ______________ Appeal No. 1995-2374 Application 07/673,1581 _______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH, and LORIN, Administrative Patent Judges. WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the examiner's decision refusing to allow claims 5 through 9 and 11 through 18, all the claims pending in the application. Application for patent filed March 18, 1991. According to appellants, this application is1 a continuation of Application 07/261,573, filed October 24, 1988 (abandoned). 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007